As expected, the Supreme Court has denied cert in the case of Joe Shuster heir Mark Peary.
I’ve noted elsewhere that, contrary to what the rest of the entertainment press asserts, the filing of amicus briefs in support of a petition is not a sign of case momentum, and the outcome of the Shuster case illustrates why it’s important to understand this.
As for Justice Roberts’ recusal, it’s worth noting that he has done this before with cases involving a Warner Bros. subsidiary, such as Ching v. Warner Bros. Studio Facilities Inc. and Tenenbaum v. Sony BMG Music Entertainment Inc., et al. This is typically a sign of an investment.
Where can we find a summary of this case?
@Torsten
https://www.comicsbeat.com/the-legal-view-what-the-shuster-ruling-means/
https://www.comicsbeat.com/todays-superman-rulings-explained/
Comments are closed.